Final answer:
Mike would be best described as an atheist, as he does not believe in God and values science as the ultimate truth. Atheism does not necessarily equate to a lack of morality, and many historical humanitarians have been atheists or agnostics.
Step-by-step explanation:
Mike, who does not believe in divine beings such as God and considers science as the ultimate truth, would best be described as a(n) atheist. Atheists are individuals who do not believe in a divine being or entity. This perspective is not uncommon in society and does not inherently mean an absence of morality. Many influential figures, including Nobel Peace Prize winners, identify as atheists or agnostics – those who believe that the reality of divine entities such as God is unknowable. Various beliefs and philosophies exist related to the existence of God and science, from the idea of materialism where only the material world is acknowledged, to monism, where all existence is perceived as ideas within the mind of a creator, as in Christian Science or certain interpretations of Hinduism. However, the theory of evolution and science in general remain neutral on the spiritual world, allowing individuals to reconcile their personal and scientific views as they choose.