225k views
3 votes
What is required for the unavailability of hearsay exceptions, such as "FAD PINKERTON"?

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The unavailability of hearsay exceptions, often remembered through mnemonics like 'FAD PINKERTON,' refers to situations where the statement's originator, or declarant, cannot testify in court. This could be due to several reasons such as death, illness, or refusal to testify. The Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause typically requires in-person testimony, but certain hearsay exceptions can apply when the declarant is unavailable, allowing the hearsay evidence to be admitted in court.

Step-by-step explanation:

Understanding Hearsay Exceptions and Unavailability

Hearsay is an out-of-court statement presented to prove the truth of the matter asserted and is typically excluded from evidence under the rule against hearsay. However, there are numerous exceptions to this rule, which are allowed under certain circumstances. One such set of exceptions is the Federal Rules of Evidence “FAD PINKERTON,” which is a mnemonic that some students use to remember certain hearsay exceptions, though it's not an official legal term. When the content loaded What is required for the unavailability of these hearsay exceptions, it generally refers to the requirement that the declarant (the person who made the statement) must be unavailable for the exception to apply. Their unavailability could be because of death, illness, being outside of the court's jurisdiction and unable to attend, or refusing to testify despite a court order.

In the context of the exclusionary rule, exceptions can include instances where evidence was obtained without following legal procedures but is still admitted in court due to reasons such as the “good faith” exception or the “inevitable discovery” doctrine. These exceptions to the exclusionary rule illustrate that even when procedures are not strictly followed, certain evidence may still be admissible if it satisfies particular criteria that the court recognizes as valid despite the procedural error.

The Sixth Amendment also plays a role here, as it guarantees the right to confront witnesses, which means testimony generally must be given in court and be subject to cross-examination. Certain hearsay exceptions abridge this right when the declarant is unavailable to testify and certain reliability criteria are met, making the hearsay admissible (for example, an admission made by the defendant or a dying declaration).

User Sankalp Singha
by
8.8k points