Final answer:
Representation of Middle Eastern leaders at key international meetings might have promoted policies aligning more closely with regional interests, potentially fostering global stability and influencing pivotal events like the Arab Spring and the Cold War's regional impact.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the leaders of the Middle East had been represented at major international meetings, the region's history could have unfolded differently. Inclusion of Middle Eastern leaders could have promoted global stability and fostered policies more reflective of the region's interests and concerns.
An example of Western influence on Middle Eastern affairs is the nationalization of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company in 1951 by Iranian Prime Minister Mosaddegh, which led to a British and American-backed coup after he attempted to gain control over Iran's oil resources. Similarly, the outcomes of the Cold War and the regional policies derived from the Camp David Accords highlight the impact of exclusive meetings where Middle Eastern voices were not equitably represented.
Including Middle Eastern leaders in deliberations could have, for instance, resulted in a different approach to the region during the Arab Spring and may have impacted the dynamics of Cold War alignments. Notably, Syrian crisis might have been approached with greater regional input potentially altering the course of the conflict. Overall, representation at such summits and negotiations would likely have increased the probability of arriving at solutions more congruent with the Middle East's heterogeneous society, politics, and culture.