Question

why might the unsafe consumer products argument be a more effective strategy (from the perspective of the importing country) than using tariffs or quotas to restrict imports?

Answer 1

The unsafe consumer products argument may be a more effective strategy for an importing country to restrict imports compared to using tariffs or quotas. This strategy allows the country to protect the health and safety of its citizens, avoids potential trade conflicts, and aligns with international standards.

Step-by-step explanation:

The unsafe consumer products argument may be a more effective strategy than using tariffs or quotas to restrict imports for several reasons. First, using the argument of unsafe consumer products allows the importing country to protect the health and safety of its citizens. By restricting imports that do not meet the necessary health and safety standards, the country can prevent harmful or dangerous products from entering the market. Second, this strategy avoids potential conflicts and tensions that can arise from imposing tariffs or quotas. Countries may perceive these measures as unfair or protectionist, leading to trade disputes and retaliatory actions. Finally, focusing on unsafe consumer products is in line with international standards and regulations. The World Trade Organization allows countries to set their own health and safety standards as long as they have a scientific basis and do not discriminate between countries.