Final answer:
Hearing a poem read aloud to music can evoke stronger emotions and emphasize particular rhythms or emotions within the poem, while reading in silence allows for a more personal interpretation without external influences.
The Correct Option is; d) Both a and c.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hearing a poem read aloud to music compared to reading it in silence can significantly affect our emotional engagement and interpretation of the text. The added auditory dimension of music might create a more evocative experience as it can intensify emotions and set a specific mood or atmosphere, potentially steering the listener's emotions in a particular direction linked to the poem's themes.
In contrast, reading the poem without music allows for a quieter, more introspective engagement, giving the reader the freedom to interpret the rhythms, tones, and emotions from the text without any external influence, thus fostering a more personal interpretation of the poem.
Moreover, music accompanying a poem can also dictate pacing and stress certain phrases, drawing attention to specific parts of the poem over others. This auditory guidance can highlight rhythms and emotions in the poem that might not be as noticeable when reading silently to oneself.
This active participation by the listener through their body and senses helps establish a deeper connection with the poem, as if embodying the words themselves. Therefore, options a) and c) are both valid reflections on how music can alter the experience of engaging with poetry.