Final answer:
The relationship between affluence and social behavior in society is complex. Affluence may lead to greater independence but does not invariably result in greater isolation, as this depends on individual choices and cultural context.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement inquires whether becoming more affluent in society leads to purchasing greater independence and in turn results in greater isolation. This topic is multifaceted and can be analyzed from social and economic perspectives, drawing on examples such as the market revolution and the temperance movement in the United States, as well as the influence of consumerism in modern society. It is important to note that the relationship between affluence and social behavior is complex and not universally applicable, as individual and cultural differences play significant roles in these dynamics.
Increasing affluence often provides the means for individuals to seek greater independence, reflected in their living arrangements and lifestyle choices. However, this does not necessarily equate to isolation as affluent individuals may engage in social activities and build networks differently. Moreover, consumerism, despite sometimes being critiqued for contributing to isolation, can also provide avenues for social interaction and shared experiences.
The history of American society, including the results of the market revolution and shifts in identity mentioned in the reference material, provides some evidence for the correlation between wealth, independence, and social dynamics. The notion of separate spheres and the Cult of Domesticity, for example, was a clear demarcation of class and social behavior that distinguished the middle class from the working class in America. Meanwhile, the Enlightenment's rejection of mercantilism in favor of the creation of wealth shifted economic practices and contributed to the rise of individualism and new social relations.