Final answer:
Public art is not required to be funded solely with public funds, thus the statement is False. Dillon's Rule actually restricts local government autonomy by requiring express state authorization, making the statement False. It is true that the colonists were more concerned with tax representation than with the principle of taxation itself.
Step-by-step explanation:
Public art does not have to be funded exclusively with public money. Many public art projects are funded through a combination of public and private resources, including grants, donations, and fundraising efforts. Therefore, the statement that public art must be funded with public money is False.
Dillon's Rule states that local governments only have powers expressly granted by state law, so it restricts rather than grants freedom and flexibility. The correct answer to Dillon's Rule giving local governments freedom and flexibility is False.
During the time leading up to the American Revolution, colonists were mostly upset over their lack of representation in Parliament, which was making decisions about their taxes without their input. Thus, it is True that the colonists did not necessarily object to the principle of taxation, but rather how the tax money would be applied.
The Necessary and Proper Clause, also known as the Elastic Clause, allows Congress to make laws it deems necessary and proper for carrying out its powers. It has been used to expand the power of the national government rather than limit it. Thus, the statement that the Necessary and Proper Clause has limited the power of the national government is False.