Final answer:
The assertion that the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is empirically supported as a selection best practice is false. While the MBTI is a popular personality assessment tool, its validity and reliability for professional selection are debated, and it is oversimplistic to categorize individuals into 16 personality types.
Step-by-step explanation:
The use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) for selection processes is not universally supported by empirical research as a best practice. Although the MBTI is a widely recognized self-report inventory that categorizes individuals into 16 distinct personality types based on their preferences in perception and judgement, its empirical validity and reliability for selecting candidates in professional settings is frequently debated among scholars and practitioners in the field of psychology.
Critics of the MBTI argue that people are more nuanced than the 16 distinct categories presented by the test. The binary nature of the results is often seen as a simplification of human behavior, which can lead to misleading conclusions. Moreover, findings such as the over-representation of certain personality types among specific groups - like the reported high incidence of the INTJ type on a particular website which far exceeded its general population frequency - suggest that the results from MBTI assessments can be significantly influenced by the context in which they're administered and the self-selecting nature of participants.
Thus, the assertion, 'The use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is supported by empirical research as a selection best practice' is False, as the MBTI is not unequivocally supported by empirical research for selection purposes.