Final Answer:
In Fisher v Bell, the case involves the interpretation of an offer for the sale of goods rather than a numerical ratio.
Step-by-step explanation:
Fisher v Bell is a legal case that revolves around contract law and the concept of invitation to treat. The case pertains to the display of goods in a shop, particularly the hanging of a flick knife with a price tag. The legal issue was whether the display constituted a criminal offense of offering to sell an illegal weapon. The court held that the display was not an offer but an invitation to treat, meaning an invitation for customers to make an offer to purchase.
Therefore, there is no numerical ratio involved in Fisher v Bell; instead, it is centered on the legal interpretation of the display of goods in a shop and the distinction between an offer and an invitation to treat.
The significance of Fisher v Bell lies in its impact on contract law principles, specifically the distinction between an offer and an invitation to treat. This case has influenced subsequent legal decisions and discussions around the formation of contracts. Understanding the nuances of such cases is essential in legal education to grasp the complexities of contract law and how legal principles are applied to real-world scenarios.