117k views
0 votes
Consider the story of Marty grimsley who recently help up a federal saving and loan bank in whichita Kansas Marty pistol in hand demanded a sum no less than 100,000 from the teller. when he was told that the bank had only 30,000 on site. Marty demanded not only that amount in cash but also the remaining 70,000 his stipulation was this the 70,000 had to be in the form of a check! naturally the law caught up with grimsley when he tried to deposit the check into his own bank. good job, Marty!

the author views Marty as?
a. an astute bandit
b. a victim of circumstance
c. a sadistic criminal
d. an imprudent robber

User Sgosha
by
9.0k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Marty Grimsley is viewed as an imprudent robber due to his lack of foresight in demanding a check during a bank heist and his attempt to deposit it into his own bank account, which led to his capture.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the story provided, the author likely views Marty Grimsley as d. an imprudent robber. The notion that Marty, with a pistol in hand, demanded not only the cash available but also a check for the remaining amount demonstrates a significant lack of foresight and an impractical approach to crime.

His arrest following the attempt to deposit the check into his own bank account further underlines his imprudence. This scenario reflects a lack of understanding of modern banking systems, wherein most money exists as electronic records, rather than physical currency that can be easily stolen and used.

User Alfergon
by
8.3k points