113k views
3 votes
Nutrition programs are advised to integrate aspects of WASH intervention to increase their overall impact on indicators such as stunting. Which of the following WASH interventions might be the most feasible for nutrition-related programs to include and implement?

a) Building latrines
b) Promoting handwashing
c) Installing water filtration systems
d) All of the above

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

To increase their overall impact on undernutrition and stunting, nutrition programs can feasibly include WASH interventions such as promoting handwashing, building latrines, and installing water filtration systems, with the choice depending on specific context and resource availability.

Step-by-step explanation:

Nutrition programs are advised to integrate aspects of WASH (Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene) intervention to improve outcomes in undernutrition and stunting. Among the options provided, promoting handwashing, building latrines, and installing water filtration systems are feasible interventions, with the most feasible being the context-specific one. Integrating these WASH interventions can lead to better health outcomes by reducing the incidence of waterborne diseases, thus improving nutritional status.

Handwashing is a cost-effective practice that can significantly reduce the spread of diarrheal diseases, which are especially harmful to the nutritional status of children. Building latrines aids in reducing the spread of fecal-oral diseases, improving community health, and can be adapted to the resource availability of a given area. Water filtration systems, though potentially more resource-intensive, can provide immediate improvements in water quality, leading to reductions in disease and undernutrition. However, all interventions must consider local conditions, acceptability, and sustainability when being implemented.

User Vitalii Elenhaupt
by
7.5k points