Question

Pretend to be a court reporter. Write a newspaper article describing the events of Act 1 as you observed them. Include details around the 5Ws + 1H (who, what, when, where, why, and how). Use at least three supporting examples or quotations from Act 1. 100-200 words.

For this assessment, you will be completing three writing tasks as you read/listen to 12 Angry Men:

Task 1: Write a newspaper article after finishing Act 1.
Task 2: Write a persuasive paragraph after finishing Act 2.
Task 3: Write a letter (after finishing Act 3).

Juror 8 is considered the protagonist, or main character, in the play. Which juror or jurors can be considered the antagonist(s), or the ones who cause problems for the protagonist? Write a persuasive paragraph and support your opinion with at least three examples or quotations from Act 2. 100-200 words

Answer 1

This newspaper article describes the events of Act 1 in 12 Angry Men, highlighting Juror 8's role in questioning evidence and seeking justice. It includes three supporting examples from the act.

Step-by-step explanation:

Newspaper Article: Events of Act 1 in 12 Angry Men

In the bustling courtroom, 12 jurors gathered for the trial of a young boy, accused of murdering his father. The trial commenced at 10:00 a.m., with a diverse group of jurors from various backgrounds and temperaments. The jury room, a stuffy and claustrophobic space, became the backdrop for intense deliberation over the defendant's fate.

Juror 8, the protagonist, stood in stark contrast to the majority of jurors who were quick to declare the defendant guilty. He questioned the reliability of the evidence and the haste with which the others formed opinions. His persistence in seeking justice led to further examination of the facts.

For instance, Juror 8 challenged the testimony of the elderly witness who claimed to have seen the defendant fleeing the scene. He argued that the witness might have misidentified the defendant due to poor eyesight, which planted seeds of doubt in the minds of some jurors.

Additionally, Juror 8 explored the possibility that the switchblade knife, considered the murder weapon, was not as unique as previously believed. He produced an identical knife, highlighting the potential for reasonable doubt.

Furthermore, Juror 8 drew attention to the lack of forethought in the investigation, exposing potential biases and oversights that tainted the handling of the case. His meticulous analysis of the evidence shed light on the flaws within the justice system.