Question

When considering whether workers assume a risk by choice, what disanalogy distinguishes it from a case of coercion?

a. A worker is not forced to accept a job
b. Other jobs may be more hazardous
c. There may be other people willing to accept the job
d. Not all jobs are hazardous
Please select the correct option.

Answer 1

The disanalogy that distinguishes the case of workers assuming a risk by choice from a case of coercion is that there may be other people willing to accept the job, suggesting that the worker had a choice in assuming the risk.

Step-by-step explanation:

The disanalogy that distinguishes the case of workers assuming a risk by choice from a case of coercion is option c: There may be other people willing to accept the job.

This disanalogy suggests that even if a worker faces risks in their current job, there may be other individuals who are willing to accept the same job willingly, implying that the worker had a choice in assuming the risk.

This contrasts with coercion, where a person is forced and does not have an alternative or choice.