177k views
5 votes
In a legal dispute concerning whether or not an employer had just cause to dismiss an employee:

a. the onus is on the employer to show, on a balance of probabilities, that it had just cause
b. the onus is on the employee to show, on a balance of probabilities, that the employer did not have just cause
c. the onus is on the employer to show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it had just cause
d. the onus is on the employee to show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the employer did not have just cause

User Emraz
by
8.5k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The onus is on the employer to prove on a balance of probabilities that there was just cause for dismissing an employee in a legal dispute. The correct option is a.

Step-by-step explanation:

In a legal dispute concerning whether an employer had just cause to dismiss an employee, the onus is on the employer to demonstrate, on a balance of probabilities, that it had just cause for the dismissal. This means that the employer must present evidence that is more convincing to the judge or jury than the employee's evidence.

Unlike a criminal case, where the burden is to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt, in a civil matter such as employment termination, the proof only needs to show that it is more likely than not that the employer had a valid reason to terminate the employee.

Hence, Option a is correct.

User Mlenthusiast
by
8.9k points