Final answer:
The defenses to the Felony Murder Rule are generally not broader than murder more generally. However, there are limitations and exceptions to the rule, such as cases involving individuals who did not actually kill, attempt to kill, or intend for a killing to take place, or individuals who are considered insane.
Step-by-step explanation:
The defenses to the Felony Murder Rule are generally not broader than murder more generally. The Felony Murder Rule is a legal doctrine that holds a person responsible for any death that occurs during the commission of a dangerous felony, even if the person did not actually intend to cause the death. Under this rule, defendants can be charged with murder for deaths that occur as a result of certain specified felonies.
However, there are certain limitations and exceptions to the Felony Murder Rule. For example, in the case of Enmund v. Florida (1982), the Supreme Court ruled that a death sentence cannot be imposed on offenders who are involved in a felony during which a murder is committed, but who did not actually kill, attempt to kill, or intend that a killing take place. Similarly, in the case of Ford v. Wainwright (1986), the Supreme Court held that a death sentence cannot be imposed on individuals who are insane. These rulings provide some limitations and defenses to the application of the Felony Murder Rule.