Final answer:
A suit for condemnation will generally result in fair market value compensation following litigation because it involves the government taking private property for public use under the principle of eminent domain, as outlined in the Fifth Amendment.
Step-by-step explanation:
Typically, a suit for condemnation will generally result in fair market value compensation following litigation. The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees that private property cannot be taken for public use without just compensation. This principle is central to the power of eminent domain, where the government takes private property for public use, such as for transportation routes or other infrastructure projects that benefit the public at large. When property is taken under eminent domain, the property owner is entitled to a fair market value for their loss. In contrast, a suit to quiet title is used to clarify the ownership rights over a property, and a suit to change zoning may seek to adjust the permissible uses of the property but does not involve compensation for property taken. Lastly, a suit for the equity of redemption pertains to the right of a mortgagor to redeem property before a foreclosure sale and also does not necessarily result in market value compensation. The key is that with condemnation suits specifically, the legal emphasis is on ensuring equitable compensation for the property taken.