Final answer:
GPS tracking's effectiveness in preventing sexual assaults by monitoring sex offenders is debated, and while it may aid law enforcement, it raises privacy concerns. Its preventive impact is not definitive and depends on how it is used within broader law enforcement strategies.
Step-by-step explanation:
The effectiveness of GPS tracking on sex offenders as a way of preventing sexual assaults is a complex issue that intersects with geographic information systems (GIS), law enforcement strategies, and the philosophy of punishment. While GPS tracking can be a tool for monitoring the movements of sex offenders, its preventive impact on sexual assaults is not clear-cut. Technological surveillance has value in aiding law enforcement and can protect public safety, but it must be weighed against concerns of privacy and the potential for abuse. The effectiveness of such measures depends heavily on how they are integrated into a broader strategy of crime prevention, which may include community-oriented policing, hot spots policing, and other targeted law enforcement tactics. The strategic deployment of GPS tracking for sex offenders could potentially be a part of deterring future crimes, yet the actual impact on prevention is a matter for empirical investigation and is debated among experts.