121k views
1 vote
Considering Dupin's discussion of all the evidence and the idea that he is waiting for someone to come to his door that was involved in the murders, why do you think the author does not have Dupin tell the narrator who he thinks the murderer is at this point?

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

Dupin's decision to not reveal his suspicions at this point in the story may serve to build suspense and maintain the mystery. He may be waiting for the right moment to reveal the truth and catch the murderer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Dupin's decision to not reveal his suspicions about the murderer at this point in the story may serve multiple purposes. One reason could be to build suspense and maintain the mystery surrounding the crime. By keeping the reader and the narrator in the dark about his thoughts, Dupin adds to the intrigue and excitement of the narrative. Additionally, Dupin may not want to disclose his suspicions until he has gathered enough evidence to support his claims. He may be waiting for the right moment to reveal the truth and catch the murderer.

User Pillowcase
by
8.2k points