Final answer:
4) The IU swimming pool is not a public good.
Explanation:
Public goods are characterized by two key attributes: non-excludability and non-rivalrous consumption. Non-excludability means that individuals cannot be excluded from using the good, and non-rivalrous consumption implies that one person's use does not diminish its availability to others.
The IU swimming pool (Option 4) does not meet the criterion of non-excludability, as access to the swimming pool can be restricted or controlled. Unlike public goods, such as the formula for the chemical structure of Vitamin C (Option 1), Wikipedia (Option 2), and Beethoven's 9th Symphony (Option 3), which are typically freely accessible and can be enjoyed by multiple individuals simultaneously without exclusion.
The IU swimming pool is an example of a club good, where access can be restricted, and individuals may need to pay for membership or entrance. This distinction highlights the difference between public goods and goods that exhibit characteristics of private or club goods. While the chemical formula, Wikipedia, and Beethoven's symphony can be shared and accessed by many without exclusion, the swimming pool's usage is more exclusive and subject to limitations, making it not a public good in economic terms.
In conclusion, understanding the economic principles of public goods helps distinguish between goods like the IU swimming pool and true public goods, clarifying the nature of their accessibility and consumption.