40.8k views
4 votes
Santiago Nasar was evidently not an innocent man, he was taking advantage of Divina Flor and she did not warn him that he was going to die. But the author leaves it to the reader to decide whether his actions merit his death?

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The question encourages a literary analysis on whether Santiago Nasar's morally ambiguous actions justify his fate in his respective narrative, which is left for reader interpretation.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question revolves around the ethical ponderings concerning Santiago Nasar's fate in the novel. It challenges the reader to contemplate whether his behavior, particularly towards Divina Flor, justifies the eventual tragedy that befalls him. It is a question of whether extrajudicial punishment for perceived moral failings by characters in literature are seen as an acceptable outcome within the narrative. This kind of moral ambiguity is a common device in literature to evoke thought and discussion about justice and human behavior. Literary texts often present characters and scenarios that make readers question the nature of morality and the complexities of human actions within a societal context.

User Sunita
by
7.7k points