Question

How is quoting a source different from paraphrasing it?

A. Quoting uses the source's exact wording, while paraphrasing puts the source's points in your own words.

B. Primary sources should only be quoted, and secondary sources should only be paraphrased.

C. You must quote a source if it's written in first-person point of view, but you must paraphrase a source if it's written in the third person.

D. There's no difference between quoting and paraphrasing a source.

Answer 1

Quoting uses the exact wording of the source, while paraphrasing involves restating the source's points in your own words. Both require citation, and paraphrasing necessitates a full understanding and rephrasing of the original text. The correct answer is option A.

Step-by-step explanation:

Quoting a source involves using the exact wording of the source, typically enclosed in quotation marks. This is different from paraphrasing, which involves restating the source's points in your own words. Quoting is useful for emphasizing specific language or ideas, while paraphrasing helps you to maintain your voice in writing and can improve clarity when the original text is long or complex. Both techniques require proper citation to give credit to the original author and avoid plagiarism.

When you paraphrase, it's essential to completely rephrase the original material and not just change a few words here and there. The act of paraphrasing encourages deeper engagement with the text, as you must fully understand the source material to restate it in your own unique way. When using either method, it's important to integrate these sourced elements into your own narrative, supplementing rather than overwhelming your own points and analysis.