Question

A presumptive ID differs from a positive ID in that:

A. A presumptive ID is based more on context than something like DNA evidence.
B. A body cannot be released if only a presumptive ID has been established.
C. A tattoo match would suffice for a presumptive ID.
D. Both A and C

Answer 1

A presumptive ID is less reliable and generally based on context or physical descriptions like tattoos, while positive ID involves definite proof such as DNA or fingerprints.

Step-by-step explanation:

Presumptive identification (ID) and positive identification are two methods used to confirm an individual's identity, often used in law enforcement and legal settings. A presumptive ID is generally based on less definitive evidence and can include contextual clues, such as personal belongings, tattoos, or physical descriptions.

It is considered less reliable because it is based on probabilistic evidence, rather than direct, and can lead to erroneous conclusions as shown by cases studied by the Innocence Project, where eyewitness misidentification has caused wrongful convictions. On the other hand, positive ID refers to identification methods that are conclusive and virtually indisputable, such as matching DNA evidence, fingerprints, or dental records. Therefore, the correct answer would be D. Both A and C, as a presumptive ID can be based on context such as a tattoo match, rather than concrete evidence like DNA.