Final answer:
Funds are distributed to entities based on different contexts, such as the 9/11 disaster or federal tax dollars. The principle of distributive justice is used to decide who receives the funds, and different principles like equality or need-based distribution can be favored.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distribution of funds varies depending on the context. For example, in the case of the 9/11 disaster, federal money was distributed to charities to support the victims. In terms of federal tax dollars, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reported that in 2015, the funds were allocated to various functional categories such as health care, education, pensions, welfare, transportation, protection, interest on the state debt, and other spending. Similarly, state spending tends to focus on areas like health care, education, and pensions, while local spending is used for public welfare, medical care, retirement funds, higher education, highway construction, and state police.
The principle of distributive justice is often used to decide who gets what. There are different principles that can be favored, such as equality, need-based distribution, or merit-based distribution. The choice of principle depends on the values and goals of the society or organization. For example, some may favor an equal distribution of funds to ensure fairness, while others may prioritize distributing funds based on the needs of individuals or communities.