230k views
0 votes
If a guest were to slip and fall in a puddle where there was not a wet-floor sign, or other reasonable indication of danger, then the hotel has likely committed:

a) A tort
b) A superior knowledge violation
c) A breach of written contract
d) A premises liability infraction
e) A criminal infraction

User Compositr
by
8.6k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The hotel has likely committed a premises liability infraction by not providing a wet-floor sign or other indication of danger, which is required to maintain a safe environment for guests under premises liability law.

Step-by-step explanation:

If a guest were to slip and fall in a puddle where there was not a wet-floor sign, or other reasonable indication of danger, then the hotel has likely committed a premises liability infraction. This is because hotels and other establishments have a duty to maintain a safe environment for their guests. If they fail to do so, and that failure leads to an injury, they can be held liable under premises liability law, which is a type of tort.

This area of law requires property owners to take reasonable steps to ensure their premises are safe. A wet floor without proper signage could be seen as a breach of that duty, as guests are not properly warned of the potential danger. The lack of such a warning could lead to the hotel's negligence being considered the cause of the accident.

User GooseSerbus
by
8.7k points