68.7k views
0 votes
Where does WMM determine that women are better jurors than men?

A) Communication skills and empathy
B) Logical reasoning and objectivity
C) Decision-making under pressure
D) None of the above

User Ryoung
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

According to Women's Moral Model, women would be likely better jurors due to their communication skills and empathy, the answer being A) Communication skills and empathy. This approach highlights the importance of emotional connection in ethical reasoning, which aligns with Carol Gilligan's views on morality research.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement regarding Women's Moral Model (WMM) assesses the capacity for jurors on the basis of their gender. According to WMM, women are likely to be better jurors because of their strong communication skills and empathy, thus the answer to the question is A) Communication skills and empathy.

This line of thinking is rooted in the belief that moral reasoning and ethical judgment benefit from an emotional understanding and connection with individuals and their circumstances, contrasting with the traditional, more dispassionate 'ethical principles' often associated with masculinity.

Carol Gilligan argued that prior morality research had largely overlooked sympathetic reactions to moral situations, which aligns with the assertions about women's strong empathetic capabilities in moral and ethical assessments.

User Rishabh Singhal
by
7.0k points