Question

At a conference in 2011, NASA scientists held an informal vote on what sci-fi movies they deemed most and least plausible. The least plausible was the apocalyptic action movie "2012." The most plausible was what 1997 film, starring Ethan Hawke and Uma Thurman?

Answer 1

The most plausible sci-fi movie voted by NASA scientists in 2011 was 'Gattaca', due to its realistic portrayal of genetic engineering's impact on society, while '2012' was deemed the least plausible for its ungrounded apocalyptic premise.

Step-by-step explanation:

In an informal vote by NASA scientists at a conference in 2011 about the plausibility of science fiction films, the 1997 movie deemed most plausible was Gattaca, starring Ethan Hawke and Uma Thurman. The film explores the ramifications of genetic engineering and the moral and socio-economic issues surrounding it, set in a future where one's life opportunities are determined by their genetic profile. On the other end of the spectrum, the movie 2012, with its apocalyptic theme based on the supposed Mayan prediction of the world's end, was voted the least plausible, as the idea of the Maya predicting the end of the world has been widely discredited.