Final answer:
While Blamire does not explicitly state whether Christian or secular thinking is subject to error, the context suggests that both are susceptible to human error and limitations due to their basis on human interpretation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question of whether Christian thinking or secular thinking is subject to error is not directly addressed by Blamire. Nonetheless, examining the provided texts reveals a nuanced view. Early Christians were often critical of secular philosophy, specifically Platonism, because it presented a rival school of spirituality. Still, they were not opposed to critical thinking per se.
Furthermore, Christian thinkers like Tertullian favored the revelations in Scripture over human reason, suggesting that Christian thinking was preferred even if it might oppose secular rationale. Additionally, most philosophers throughout history did have religious beliefs, and many were even influenced by religion, undermining the argument that philosophy inherently dismisses religious thought. Therefore, both Christian and secular thinking are subject to human error and limitations, as both are products of human interpretation and understanding.