Final answer:
The trial of Walter McMillian lacked critical evidence such as conflicting witness descriptions and the absence of fingerprint evidence, raising questions about the fairness of his conviction.
Step-by-step explanation:
The trial of Walter McMillian, also known as Johnny D, lacked several key pieces of evidence that were not presented to the jury, which are critical when assessing the fairness of the trial and his conviction. Two significant points of evidence that were omitted include:
- Conflicting witness descriptions that did not align with McMillian's appearance, suggesting that others may have been responsible for the crime.
- The absence of fingerprint evidence linking McMillian to the crime scene, which questions the physical evidence against him.
These omissions, along with others, highlight issues with the criminal justice system's handling of the case and contribute to ongoing debates about fairness and equality in legal proceedings, especially for minorities and marginalized groups.