Final answer:
The most directly connected reason to the claim about workers receiving substantial compensation following injuries due to unsafe factory conditions is 'Compensation should match the severity of injuries'. It underlines the importance of proportional compensation relative to the injuries. Historical incidents like the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire have emphasized the need for such practices.
Step-by-step explanation:
The clearest connection to the claim that workers who suffer injuries due to unsafe factory conditions should receive substantial compensation from their employer is option C: Compensation should match the severity of injuries. This directly addresses the link between the injury's impact on the worker and the compensation the employer must provide. Workers' rights and safe working conditions are crucial, but the emphasis here is on the proportionality of the compensation to the injury sustained.
Historical examples such as the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire highlight the importance of workers' rights and safety. The terrible toll on workers due to poor safety measures in factories has led to significant reforms in labor laws and practices. Yet, it remains a challenge to ensure that all employment sectors prioritize worker safety, and regulations continue to evolve to address these concerns effectively.
Modern legislation allowing for confidential employee complaints and the potential for fines for companies that violate safety regulations serves as a testament to the ongoing struggle for safe workplace conditions. Consequently, substantial compensation is seen as both a remedy for the worker and a deterrent for the employer against maintaining hazardous working conditions.