The Constitution had checks and balances on government but did little to protect the rights of citizens. The Constitution had checks and balances on government but did little to protect the rights of citizens.

Wolfins asked Jan 1, 2023

485,090 views

The Constitution had checks and balances on government but did little to protect the rights of citizens.

The Constitution had checks and balances on government but did little to protect the rights of citizens.

The Constitution had few checks on the executive branch, which would lead to the creation of a king.
The Constitution had few checks on the executive branch, which would lead to the creation of a king.

The Constitution had checks and balances that gave too many rights to common people.
The Constitution had checks and balances that gave too many rights to common people.

The Constitution had checks and balances that would ensure the government would be limited in its power.