Final answer:
Under a shipment contract, the seller is required to deliver goods to a carrier, not to a particular destination. It is legitimate for a country to impose higher safety standards on imported goods than in the country of production to protect consumers and maintain product quality.
Step-by-step explanation:
False. Under a shipment contract, the seller's requirement is to deliver the goods to a carrier for transport, not necessarily to a particular destination. The risk of loss passes to the buyer when the seller delivers the goods to the carrier. On the other hand, a destination contract requires the seller to deliver conforming goods to a specific destination, and the seller retains the risk of loss until delivery at that destination.
Regarding safety standards for imported goods, it is legitimate for a country to impose higher safety standards on imported goods compared to the standards that exist in the foreign country where the goods were produced. This is often done to protect consumers, ensure public safety, and maintain higher product quality within the importing country. However, such measures should comply with international trade agreements and not be used as a means of protectionism.