187k views
4 votes
Explain the four determinants to link together of trade theories. 2. Give an example, discuss the pros and cons of the globalization debate. Give at least three points for each for the pro and cons. 3. The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank are two institutions that have outlived their usefulness. Do you agree or disagree? First state their purpose, the challenges they have, and the disadvantages or advantages. Based on that, explain your agreement or disagreement.

User Twneale
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The determinants of trade theories include factor endowments, technology, demand conditions, and related industries. Globalization has both pros, such as economic growth, and cons, like inequality. The IMF and World Bank remain relevant despite criticisms, serving important roles in the global economy.

Step-by-step explanation:

Determinants of Trade Theories

The four determinants that link together the various trade theories are: factor endowments; technology; demand conditions; and the presence of related and supporting industries. An example of how these determinants connect can be seen in the automobile industry where a country's advanced technology, high demand for vehicles, skilled workforce, and a strong network of suppliers and infrastructure play a crucial role in its competitive advantage.

Globalization Debate

Pros of Globalization include increased economic growth, access to new markets, and the spread of technology. Cons of Globalization include the widening inequality, loss of cultural identity, and environmental degradation. Each point has nuanced implications on society and economics, affecting different stakeholders in various ways.

The IMF and World Bank

The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank were established to rebuild the international economic system post-World War II and to promote international monetary cooperation and financial stability. The challenges they face include accusations of promoting a one-size-fits-all approach to economic policy and contributing to debt burdens in developing countries. Despite these challenges, they also provide crucial financial support and guidance to nations. The debate over their usefulness continues in the face of evolving global needs.

Based on their purpose and the challenges and benefits they present, it is my view that while both institutions have areas for improvement, they still serve significant roles in the global economy. Therefore, I disagree with the statement that they have outlived their usefulness.

User Turkus
by
7.5k points