Final answer:
Guardian coups can destabilize regimes, leading to a power vacuum, shifts in ideology, and the rise of new leaders. They illustrate the outcomes when traditional control mechanisms fail, such as with the weak emperors of Latter Han, resulting in the decline of central control and the rise of private armies.
Step-by-step explanation:
The consequences of guardian coups on a regime can significantly impact the stability and governance of a state. Guardian coups, often undertaken by military elites or other powerful groups within a society, lead to a transformation of the existing power structure. The court elite historically managed to control warrior forces and prevent them from gaining enough power to challenge the system as a whole. However, when guardian coups do occur, they can lead to a number of outcomes such as the dismantling of traditional ruling structures, a shift in ideology, and the emergence of new leaders.
When referencing historical examples such as Dynastic rulers, it's clear that if rulers fail to promote the welfare of commoners, they risk losing the support of those they govern, which can ultimately lead to political upheaval. This dynamic was apparent in the Latter Han dynasty, where the inability of emperors to control their own courts due to intervention by consort kin and eunuchs led to a decline in public income, conscription problems, and the rise of private armies. These developments often create a power vacuum that can be exploited by rising populist leaders or demagogues, posing challenges to the stability and functionality of the regime.