Final answer:
The question discusses the problem of theodicy and the greatness of God's omniscience in the context of divine attributes like goodness and power, especially considering the existence of evil.
Philosophers like Maimonides assert that humans cannot fully comprehend God's essence, but only His actions. This debate also touches upon ontological arguments and the problem of evil.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question at hand involves theological considerations regarding the attributes of God, such as omniscience, omnibenevolence, and omnipotence, and their relevance to human beings, especially considering the presence of evil in the world.
The greatness of God's omniscience is often asserted by those of faith, and yet the distribution of this knowledge to humans is limited, prompting questions about the purpose and nature of divine wisdom.
Philosophers and theologians have long contemplated issues such as these. Maimonides, for instance, took a radical approach with his negative theology, asserting that human knowledge cannot truly comprehend God, but rather only His actions.
Moreover, this line of questioning leads into the classic problem of evil, where the existence of suffering is juxtaposed against the supposed characteristics of an all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-good deity, challenging the coherence of those attributes.
Ultimately, such discussions echo the ontological arguments for God's existence, where the necessity of God's existence is posited both intra-mentally and extra-mentally, binding conception with reality.
These explorations often circle back to the problem of theodicy, the defense of God's goodness and power in the face of evil in the world.