Question

How does one know if these reasons are valid consciously? As in, what is the experiential feeling that marks these reasons being valid? If there is no feeling that a valid reason relies on, then how can one know?

Answer 1

The validity of reasons in religious experiences is determined through rational assessment and critical thinking, not experiential feelings. Alternative explanations, witness credibility, and consistency of accounts can be evaluated to assess the reports of religious experiences. Validity relies on rational analysis, not specific feelings.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the context of religious experiences, determining the validity of reasons is not reliant on experiential feelings but rather on rational assessment and critical thinking. Whether a reason is valid or not can be evaluated by examining its logical coherence, empirical evidence, and consistency with established knowledge. It is important to recognize that personal experiences alone may not be sufficient grounds for concluding the existence of a supernatural being.

Instead, one can assess the reports of religious experiences by considering alternative explanations, examining the credibility of the witnesses, and critically analyzing the consistency and coherence of their accounts. Non-believers can question the reliability of these reports and consider alternative explanations that do not rely on supernatural or spiritual beings.

Ultimately, the validity of reasons pertaining to religious experiences relies on a rational and logical analysis rather than a specific experiential feeling.