Question

Say you are a 55 year old man. You time travel back in time to when you were 15 to discuss with your former self a topic: The time you were arrested when you were 16.

Now, the 15 year old you has all intention of doing the thing that got you arrested. But you, as a 55 year old man have contemplated the issue, acknowledged you were wrong, made things right with the victims, and have moved on.

Then you start arguing about who's fault it was. That is what I would like to hear about.

Was it both of their faults, one of their faults, or neither. Thanks!

Answer 1

The 15-year-old version is at fault for intending to commit the same actions, while the 55-year-old version has taken responsibility for his past mistakes and made efforts to move on.

Step-by-step explanation:

When discussing who is at fault for the 16-year-old's arrest, it is important to consider the actions of both the younger and older versions of the individual.

The 15-year-old version of the person intends to repeat the actions that led to the arrest, while the 55-year-old version has reflected on his past actions, acknowledged his wrongdoing, and made amends.

In this scenario, the 15-year-old version is at fault for intending to commit the same actions, while the 55-year-old version has taken responsibility for his past mistakes and made efforts to move on.

The 15-year-old version is at fault for intending to commit the same actions, while the 55-year-old version has taken responsibility for his past mistakes and made efforts to move on.