Question

If something exist mentally & physically, in both forms it is understandable that we have a Idea of it in mind as well as in reality or physically but , what about things which exists in the form of Idea only? A person exist means is it he/ she alive? If that person dead he is not exist? If we consider living beings life as the prove of their existence then what about a stone who don't have life isn't that exist? If something which is doesn't exist in our ideas & Al's in our peripheral world we never seen that or have any idea of it can we called something like that is exist? Idea's of our mind doesn't exist in real?

Answer 1

Existence can be considered in terms of physical objects that interact with our senses and conceptual or spiritual entities which exist mentally. Philosophers have historically debated the nature of existence, with dualists arguing for a non-physical mind or soul, and materialists denying anything beyond physical matter. Whether ideas or non-material entities truly exist is still a matter of philosophical debate.

Step-by-step explanation:

The concept of existence is a complex issue, especially when considering things that exist mentally, physically, or both. Material things, such as stones, undoubtedly exist in the physical world; we can see, touch, and interact with them. However, philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, and Descartes argued that non-physical entities, such as the soul or mind, also exist. These philosophers adhered to forms of dualism or idealism, which accept the existence of non-material substances.

Discussing the nature of existence, René Descartes claimed that the soul exists separate from the body and is immortal (Meditations on First Philosophy). His famous cogito argument ("I think, therefore I am") suggests that the act of thinking proves the existence of the self, independent of physical form. This form of dualism implies that a thinking entity, capable of dreaming, reasoning, and more, does not need a physical body.

Another philosophical perspective comes from Anselm's ontological argument for the existence of God, which also touches upon the idea of existence in the mind versus existence in reality. This line of thought implies that if something, like God or a concept, exists in the mind, and is conceptually greater when it exists in reality, then such a being must necessarily exist in both realms. However, critiques from philosophers like Immanuel Kant argue against this by stating that existence is not a predicate, and just because we can conceive of something mentally does not necessitate its physical existence.

In conclusion, the discussion around what it means to exist, either as a physical object, an idea, or as the supposed essence of life, continues to be a matter of philosophical debate. What we can assert is that while physical objects definitely exist, the existence of conceptual or spiritual entities is subject to interpretation and further philosophical examination.