Final answer:
In a threatened trade secret misappropriation case, the burden of proof lies with the party claiming misappropriation.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a threatened trade secret misappropriation case, the burden of proof lies with the party claiming misappropriation.
In civil cases, such as trade secret misappropriation cases, the burden of proof refers to the responsibility of the party bringing the case (plaintiff) to present evidence and prove their claim against the accused party (defendant). In this case, the party claiming misappropriation is the plaintiff and they have the burden of proving that their trade secret has been misappropriated.
For example, if a company believes that a former employee has wrongfully used their trade secret to benefit a competing company, it is the responsibility of the company (as the plaintiff) to present evidence and convince the court that a trade secret misappropriation has occurred.