57.9k views
1 vote
How did the existence of private schools hurt tax-supported public education when the rich sent their kids there?

a) Decreased government funding for education
b) Reduced the quality of public school teachers
c) Hindered the implementation of standardized testing
d) Limited access to education for the poor

User Bkhanal
by
9.0k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The existence of private schools hurt tax-supported public education by decreasing government funding, reducing the quality of public school teachers, and limiting access to education for the poor.

Step-by-step explanation:

The existence of private schools hurt tax-supported public education in several ways:

  1. Decreased government funding for education: The rich sending their kids to private schools means they are not contributing to the tax base that funds public education. As a result, school districts' budgets decline and they receive less money from property taxes and the state.
  2. Reduced the quality of public school teachers: With decreased funding, public schools often have to cut programs and fire teachers. This leads to a decline in the quality of teachers available in the public school system.
  3. Limited access to education for the poor: Private schools charge tuition, making them inaccessible for many low-income families. If private schools were the only option, a significant portion of the population, including poor and working-class children, would be unable to afford education.
User Sami Tahri
by
7.3k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.