Final answer:
Specific research comparing MEI and SEI in naming relations was not provided, but multiple exemplar instructions often lead to better generalization and application, suggesting MEI might be more effective overall. The 2003 study indirectly supports the notion that various approaches to training, similar to MEI, can enhance learning outcomes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question you've asked relates to a comparison of the effectiveness of multiple exemplar instructions (MEI) versus single exemplar instructions (SEI) in training naming relations. Specific research comparing MEI and SEI in this context wasn't provided in the background information. However, generally in educational research and training, multiple exemplar training is often found to be more effective than single exemplar training because it involves exposure to a variety of examples, which can enhance generalization and application of learned skills to new situations. On the other hand, the single exemplar approach might not provide the same breadth of learning and may limit the ability to transfer skills.
Without specific details on research regarding naming relations, it could be challenging to directly answer which is more effective, MEI or SEI. However, based on the principles of learning and generalization, MEI might be anticipated to be more effective in most scenarios. The study by Arthur, Bennett, Edens, and Bell in 2003 highlights the effectiveness of diverse forms of training, which could indirectly support the notion that a variety of training approaches (akin to multiple exemplars) may lead to better learning outcomes across different measures, including immediate responses, testing, behavioral measurements, and results such as productivity and profits.