Final answer:
Egypt's historical approach to immigration demonstrated tolerance of cultural differences, contrasting with the restrictive and discriminatory practices in the United States, particularly the Johnson-Reed Act of 1924 which established quotas favoring Northern and Western European immigrants.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question relates to Egypt's approach to immigration, which historically has shown a degree of tolerance of cultural differences. In contrast to the restrictive immigration policies of the United States from the 1920s until 1965, Arab immigration since 1965 has been characterized by more highly educated individuals, largely Muslim, seeking better opportunities while escaping political unrest. It's important to note that the United States placed quotas on immigrants from certain regions, significantly limiting immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe, and outright banning immigration from Asia to preserve a certain demographic believed to be desirable at the time.
The Johnson-Reed Act of 1924 in the United States, for example, established a quota system that favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe while imposing restrictions on immigrants from Asia, Southern, and Eastern Europe. This was part of a broader pattern of nativism and discrimination that sought to maintain a Eurocentric and largely Protestant social order in the United States.