Final answer:
The premise of the State conditioning the masses to dislike their country is contrary to the usual governmental goals. States typically use methods to foster patriotism and unity, not to instill dislike for the country.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question, "Why does the State condition the masses to dislike the country?" involves understanding a country's strategies to unite its people and strengthen national identity. Various political strategies have been used throughout history to foster a sense of unity and purpose among citizens. The maintenance of national identity has often been central to these strategies.
Political scientist Benedict Anderson argues that modern states use a variety of methods to cultivate a sense of nationhood and elicit loyalty from their citizens, reinforcing state legitimacy. These methods include governmental practices like elections and education, as well as symbols and rituals such as flags and national holidays. The goal of these efforts is not to condition the masses to dislike the country but to promote unity and a shared sense of peoplehood.
Consequently, the provided options (a) to foster patriotism, (b) to discourage travel, (c) to eliminate nationalistic tendencies, (d) to promote international cooperation, do not directly answer the question as it is phrased, given that the premise of the State conditioning the masses to dislike their country contradicts the typical government's aim to foster positive nationalistic feelings. If the State aimed to influence the masses regarding their view of the country, it would likely be to foster patriotism, which unequivocally conflicts with the premise of instilling dislike for the country.