Question

the Supreme Court case of ______ held that when analyzing the non-deadly use of police force, the officer's intent behind the use of force does not matter, so long as the amount of force used is reasonable under the circumstances

Answer 1

The Supreme Court case of Tennessee v. Garner held that the intent behind the use of non-deadly police force does not matter as long as the force used is reasonable under the circumstances.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Supreme Court case of **Tennessee v. Garner** held that when analyzing the non-deadly use of police force, the officer's intent behind the use of force does not matter, so long as the amount of force used is **reasonable under the circumstances**.

Tennessee v. Garner (1985) involved the shooting of a fleeing burglary suspect by a police officer. The Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable seizures required a police officer to have probable cause to use deadly force against a fleeing suspect. The decision established the standard that governs the use of deadly force by law enforcement.