221k views
4 votes
who would have been happer with their representation in the senate, small states or larger states? why?

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Small states would have been happier with their representation in the Senate as it provided them with equal representation regardless of population. Larger states would have preferred representation based on population. The Connecticut Compromise, with its bicameral congress, provided a compromise between the two.

Step-by-step explanation:

The representation in the Senate would have made small states happier because it provided them with equal representation regardless of population. This meant that each state, no matter its size, would have the same number of seats in the Senate. On the other hand, larger states would have preferred representation based on population, as they would have had more seats in the national legislature. Ultimately, a compromise was reached with the Connecticut Compromise, which created a bicameral congress with equal representation in the Senate and representation based on population in the House of Representatives.

User Ben Kulbertis
by
8.4k points