Final answer:
The specific U.S. Navy Regulations article allowing petitions to the Board for Correction of Naval Records for corrections in evaluations is not provided; however, service members generally use the BCNR established by 10 U.S.C. § 1552 for this purpose. CCA and CAAF deal with court-martial convictions rather than administrative records.
Step-by-step explanation:
The article in U.S. Navy Regulations that allows members to petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) for correction of error or removal of injustice in a Fitness Report (FITREP), CHIEFEVAL, or EVAL is not explicitly stated in the provided reference numbers. However, service members seeking this form of redress typically rely on the processes established by the BCNR under the authority of 10 U.S.C. § 1552. Although the exact article number is not provided, related matters are often covered under general Navy personnel regulations and the Manual of the Judge Advocate General (JAGMAN).
When it comes to matters of correction of military records, service members can seek assistance from the legal arm of the military services such as the Courts of Criminal Appeals (CCA) and the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF), but these bodies typically deal with appeals from court-martial convictions, not administrative record corrections.
The U.S. Constitution provides Congress with the authority to "To provide and maintain a Navy; To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces," which underpins the entire regulatory framework governing military personnel matters.