Final answer:
Actuaries should provide a detailed explanation of their disagreement with conflicting sources, rather than issuing a disclaimer of responsibility. Performing online research for reliable consensus involves critical evaluation of claims and seeking credible findings. The correct answer for the question is option (D)
Step-by-step explanation:
When an actuary relies on other information sources that significantly conflict with their reasonable judgment, it is not appropriate to merely ignore these discrepancies. Instead, it is important for the actuary to provide a detailed explanation of the actuary's disagreement with the conflicting sources. According to best practices, actuaries should not issue a disclaimer of responsibility in this context; rather, they should engage directly with the conflicting data to explain their reasoning.
Performing online research to learn more about a topic, an individual would start by identifying reliable sources. Comparing the information from these sources may reveal discrepancies, which necessitate additional research to find a reliable consensus view on the issue. This method involves critically evaluating the claims made across different platforms and may include search for factual and credible findings on the subject as emphasized in literature by Geraldine Palmer, Todd Rogers, Judah Viola, and Maronica Engel.
Ultimately, it's crucial for researchers and professionals alike to present informed analyses and interpretations—even in the face of conflicting information—to uphold the integrity of their work and ensure accurate understanding.