116k views
0 votes
Let f (n) be the number of ways to take an n-element set S, and, if S has more than one

element, to partition S into two disjoint nonempty subsets S1 and S2, then to take one of the
sets S1, S2 with more than one element and partition it into two disjoint nonempty subsets
S3 and S4, then to take one of the sets with more than one element not yet partitioned and
partition it into two disjoint nonempty subsets, etc., always taking a set with more than one
element that is not yet partitioned and partitioning it into two nonempty disjoint subsets,
until only one-element subsets remain. For example, we could start with 12345678 (short
for {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8}), then partition it into 126 and 34578, then partition 34578 into 4
and 3578, then 126 into 6 and 12, then 3578 into 37 and 58, then 58 into 5 and 8, then 12
into 1 and 2, and finally 37 into 3 and 7. (The order we partition the sets is important; for
instance, partitioning 1234 into 12 and 34, then 12 into 1 and 2, and then 34 into 3 and 4, is
different from partitioning 1234 into 12 and 34, then 34 into 3 and 4, and then 12 into 1 and
2. However, partitioning 1234 into 12 and 34 is the same as partitioning it into 34 and 12.)
Find a simple formula for f (n). For instance, f (1) = 1, f (2) = 1, f (3) = 3, and f (4) = 18

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The question seeks a formula for f(n), a combinatorial function counting the ways to partition an n-element set into nonempty subsets until only single elements remain. This function likely involves factorial concepts or recursive definitions due to the nature of the problem and references provided.

Step-by-step explanation:

The problem you are referring to is concerned with finding a formula for f(n), which describes the number of ways an n-element set can be partitioned into nonempty disjoint subsets until only one-element subsets are left, such that in each step a set with more than one element is partitioned. This is a problem in the field of combinatorics, a branch of mathematics concerned with counting and arrangement possibilities.

The function f(n) can be recursively defined because to calculate f(n), we need to consider all the ways to split the n-element set and then apply f(n) to the subsets. Given the examples f(1) = 1, f(2) = 1, f(3) = 3, and f(4) = 18, we observe that the function seems to grow rapidly with n. The exact formula might involve recursive definitions or factorial-based expressions, considering the references to factorial in the provided context.

From the provided context, we see concepts such as series expansions, probabilities, and numbers of outcomes in certain combinations. These concepts might help in understanding the general approach to solving this kind of problem, yet the direct formula for f(n) isn't found within the context. Therefore, we conclude that a deeper analysis is required to find a succinct formula for f(n).

User Skamielina
by
8.0k points