Final answer:
Alcoa's dominant position in the aluminum industry was due to their control over a key input, the high-quality bauxite ore. This created a natural monopoly and acted as a significant barrier to entry for other firms. Over time, various factors contributed to the weakening of these entry barriers, allowing for more competition. Option fourth is the correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The type of entry barrier responsible for Alcoa's position in the aluminum industry was the ownership of a key input, specifically their control over the world's supply of high-quality bauxite. This control represented a natural monopoly, where a single firm dominates an industry due to unique control over a scarce physical resource, making it difficult for other firms to compete.
In the 1930s, other firms could not produce enough aluminum to compete with Alcoa because they did not have access to the same quality or quantity of bauxite. Over time, the barriers to entry that Alcoa faced were weakened. This could have been due to the discovery of new bauxite resources, improvements in the efficiency of aluminum production by other companies, changes in legal or trade environments, or technological advancements that mitigated the advantages Alcoa had.
Barriers to entry act as deterrents for new competitors and include aspects such as economies of scale, control of scarce resources, legal restrictions, and intellectual property rights. In the case of Alcoa, the barrier was not due to economies of scale, patents, or government-imposed restrictions, but rather their control of bauxite. Finally, it should be noted that although Alcoa's monopoly power has been reduced, its historical dominance serves as a significant case study in understanding how control of a resource can lead to monopolistic markets.