144k views
2 votes
In Baker v. Carr (1962), the Supreme Court ruled that

O federal courts can constitutionally intervene on the issue of drawing legislative districts.
O federal courts cannot constitutionally intervene on the issue of drawing legislative districts.
O districting based exclusively on racial criteria is lawful.
O districting based exclusively on racial criteria is unlawful.

1 Answer

3 votes

In Baker v. Carr (1962), the Supreme Court ruled that O federal courts can constitutionally intervene on the issue of drawing legislative districts. Therefore , O federal courts can constitutionally intervene on the issue of drawing legislative districts is correct .

In the landmark case of Baker v. Carr (1962), the United States Supreme Court ruled that federal courts can constitutionally intervene on the issue of drawing legislative districts.

This decision marked a significant shift in the Court's stance on the "political question" doctrine, asserting that issues related to the apportionment of legislative districts were justiciable—meaning they could be reviewed by the federal judiciary.

The case originated in Tennessee, where plaintiffs argued that the state's legislative districts had not been reapportioned in accordance with population changes, leading to a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.

The Supreme Court, in a 6-2 decision, held that the matter was justiciable and that the courts could intervene to ensure that legislative districts fairly represented the principle of "one person, one vote."

This decision had far-reaching implications, as it established the principle that federal courts could review and adjudicate claims related to the constitutionality of legislative districting.

It laid the foundation for subsequent cases addressing the issue of reapportionment and the requirement for electoral districts to be roughly equal in population to ensure the equal representation of citizens—a crucial aspect of democratic governance.

User Wmitchell
by
7.5k points