Final answer:
Christiane Amanpour believes the press has an essential duty to report all that they see to safeguard democratic society and maintain public awareness. Partiality in news reporting is typically discouraged to maintain journalistic integrity, though opinion pieces permit personal perspectives. The press juggle presenting unbiased facts and diverse opinions to inform and engage the public responsibly.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering why journalist Christiane Amanpour believes that the press has a responsibility to report all that they see, it can be understood that Amanpour is a proponent of objective and comprehensive journalism. Journalistic integrity demands that reporting be done without bias to ensure the public has access to complete information, thus enabling them to form well-informed opinions. The principle of freedom of the press is crucial in a democratic society, and Amanpour's views echo the importance of this concept.
Regarding the question of whether there are situations where it is acceptable for the press to display partiality in reporting the news, the general consensus within journalistic ethics is that impartiality is a cornerstone of trustworthy journalism. However, this doesn't discount the fact that certain situations, like opinion pieces or editorial content, allow for personal perspective. In essence, while the core news reporting should remain objective, the press does have spaces where subjectivity is permissible as long as it is clearly labeled and distinguished from factual reporting.
The key dilemma stems from the need to maintain a balance between presenting the facts and maintaining the ethical standards of the profession. Journalists must navigate this balance carefully, ensuring that the integrity of the news is maintained while also providing a space for diverse perspectives and opinions. It's a delicate balance, but it underscores the essential role of the press in maintaining an informed society.